Before you read on, ask yourself a clear question: „Is a person’s skepticism a positive or negative trait?“ Now think about the biggest skeptics in your team and answer the question one more time, but do not confuse skepticism with pessimism!
One thing is for certain – skepticism is a trait both positive and necessary for a team! The reason many of us see skepticism in a negative light arises from a skeptic’s difficulty in communicating pleasantly and diplomatically. In order for a team to make the most out of their skeptic, they must first be discovered, then understood and finally communicated with in the proper way.
The analytical skeptic is known to Belbin as the Monitor Evaluator.
Every high-performing team needs someone who is intelligent, logical, fair-minded, objective and analytical. All these qualities are harbored by the Monitor Evaluator. It is their job to observe things through facts and logic, make impartial judgements and weigh up the team’s needs and options. While not the most glamorous of roles, the right decisions of a competent Monitor Evaluator – who is seldom wrong – will ensure the continued prosperity of the team.
Monitor Evaluators are represented by an all-seeing eye. They appear to stand slightly appart from the group, which is not to say they are isolated, but instead maintaining appropriate emotional detachment so as not to deviate from making objective assessments.
Monitor Evaluators are born with an immunity towards excessive enthusiasm. The need to think all things through renders them slow at making decisions, but with a proclivity towards critical thinking, they are able to come to clever conclusions and notice all possible angles. A good Monitor evaluator is seldom wrong.
For analyzing problems and appraising ideas and suggestions, the Monitor Evaluator is the best choice. They are the ones who weigh up the pros and cons of any given option and prevent the team from following ill-considered schemes and lofty ideals, thus saving everyone both time and money.
Monitor Evaluators proovide the team with clear and concise data banks of information that act as the storehouse of the group’s labours. Though mostly on the sidelines of the decision-making process, they are the ones who inform the team of gathered results.
For bystanders a Monitor Evaluator can seem dry, boring and even highly critical, and it might be surprising for them to witness one becoming a leader. Despite all of this, many Monitor Evaluators can be found at strategic job positions, and are fully capable of successfully working at higher posts, since succeeding or failing at some positions is dependent on only a few key decisions. Such a place is ideal for the Monitor Evaluator, for one who makes few mistakes usually comes out on top.
As the anchor keeps a ship from floating away, so the Monitor Evaluator keeps the team’s feet firmly on the ground. Being thorough in their analyses requires time and patience, and although some might perceive that as lagging, pressuring a Monitor Evaluator to come to a decision quickly will go unappreciated.
A team’s enthusiasm might suffer from the Monitor Evaluator’s constant call for facts and information, especially if the team is in the process of looking for new or radical ideas. Then again, they are the ones who feed the team detailed information and keep them apprised on the current status of investigations.
Things might get complicated, however, if there are too many Monitor Evaluators in a team. Imagine a meeting, that is attended by three analytical skeptics. A situation so impractical, there is a term for it: „Analysis paralysis“.